On Tue, 19 Jan 1999 08:58:14 -0500, "Rand E. Tomcala"
<rtomcala@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Gary,
> The 100-200 that I have I would judge as plastic. s/n 138800.
>Rand E.
>
>PCACala@xxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>> Dave writes:
>>
>> > Zuiko 100-200mm f5, . . . This is a Zuiko S, with the plastic aperature
>> > ring
>>
>> Hum, the one I have here sure looks metal. Perhaps a production variation.
>>
>> Gary Reese
>> Las Vegas, NV
>>
The best way of judgement is to use your lips. Cold = metal, warm =
plastic. Of course you should compare to a part of the lens you know
the material of.
Frank van Lindert.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|