sje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Frank van Lindert wrote:
>
> >I think the 35-70/3.6 is the only of the 35-70 zooms of which the
> >quality is on par with that of prime lenses.
> >IOW: much better than the 35-70/4.
> >
> >Frank van Lindert
> >Utrecht NL.
>
> Interestingly enough, the f/4 model scored well in Gary's recent lens tests.
> Does this mean Frank's 35-70/4 was a poor example? After reading the tests,
> I couldn't see that there would be a significant gain in optical performance
> in the f/3.6 but here is evidence to the contrary. Any more opinion
> (preferably from a direct comparison)?
>
> Simon E.
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
I myself asked about how the F4 compares since I own one. I realy would like to
know how it compares. However, what I can say is that the build quality isnt up
to the usual Zuiko standard. But I dont know about the optics.
--
Regards,
Alexander
http://www.mediadyne.gr/photos
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|