Frank van Lindert wrote:
>I think the 35-70/3.6 is the only of the 35-70 zooms of which the
>quality is on par with that of prime lenses.
>IOW: much better than the 35-70/4.
>
>Frank van Lindert
>Utrecht NL.
Interestingly enough, the f/4 model scored well in Gary's recent lens tests.
Does this mean Frank's 35-70/4 was a poor example? After reading the tests,
I couldn't see that there would be a significant gain in optical performance
in the f/3.6 but here is evidence to the contrary. Any more opinion
(preferably from a direct comparison)?
Simon E.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|