-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: Matthias Wilke <Matthias.K.Wilke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Till: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Datum: den 15 december 1998 00:17
Ämne: RE: [OM] my opinion about IS
>>Sorry Matthias, but regretfully I must say I was rather disappointed when
>>I opened your post. Why? Simply because the letters "IS" will always mean
>>Olympus to me. I don´t care how many millions of lenses from other
>>manufacturers that are sold with the label "IS" - it is still only Olympus
>>for me. Although the Olympus IS system being far from the OM system I
>>still think that discussions about it belongs more on this list than a
>>discussion about different types of C*n*n lenses do. If anyone has a
>>different view on this please speak out. I think the least we can except
>>from someone that uses the letters "IS" in the subject line in a post to
>>this list is to make it clear that it is NOT the Olympus IS system that is
>>referred to. This is my opinion. Anyone else?
>>
>>Per Nordenberg
>
>Sorry, I do apologize about this mistake. I did not mean to hurt you in
>this matter. I just wanted to give a comment on that discussion. While I am
>a OM-user for years, I never used an Olympus IS and so I indeed forgot to
>mark the letters IS as no Olympus matter.
>Matthias
Matthias, I accept your apology. BTW I was not hurt, merely disappointed about
the content of your post. Maybe we both can learn something from this (which
hopefully would make this a little more meaningful)?
Per Nordenberg
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|