-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: Matthias Wilke <Matthias.K.Wilke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Till: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Datum: den 14 december 1998 12:37
Ämne: [OM] my opinion about IS
Sorry Matthias, but regretfully I must say I was rather disappointed when I
opened your post. Why? Simply because the letters "IS" will always mean Olympus
to me. I don´t care how many millions of lenses from other manufacturers that
are sold with the label "IS" - it is still only Olympus for me. Although the
Olympus IS system being far from the OM system I still think that discussions
about it belongs more on this list than a discussion about different types of
C*n*n lenses do. If anyone has a different view on this please speak out. I
think the least we can except from someone that uses the letters "IS" in the
subject line in a post to this list is to make it clear that it is NOT the
Olympus IS system that is referred to. This is my opinion. Anyone else?
Per Nordenberg
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|