>Sorry Matthias, but regretfully I must say I was rather disappointed when
>I opened your post. Why? Simply because the letters "IS" will always mean
>Olympus to me. I don´t care how many millions of lenses from other
>manufacturers that are sold with the label "IS" - it is still only Olympus
>for me. Although the Olympus IS system being far from the OM system I
>still think that discussions about it belongs more on this list than a
>discussion about different types of C*n*n lenses do. If anyone has a
>different view on this please speak out. I think the least we can except
>from someone that uses the letters "IS" in the subject line in a post to
>this list is to make it clear that it is NOT the Olympus IS system that is
>referred to. This is my opinion. Anyone else?
>
>Per Nordenberg
Sorry, I do apologize about this mistake. I did not mean to hurt you in
this matter. I just wanted to give a comment on that discussion. While I am
a OM-user for years, I never used an Olympus IS and so I indeed forgot to
mark the letters IS as no Olympus matter.
Matthias
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|