Thanks for that Gary. So, putting it another way then, what's the best
OM 35-70 to look for?
Regards,
Steve
>
>Steve Worner writes:
>
>> With Olympus, up until recently at
>> least, a Zuiko lens was a Zuiko lens. You could buy it knowing it
would
>> fit OM-1/2/3/4/10/20 etc and offer consistent quality.
>
>The S Zuikos are a way of saying, "we are letting performance slide at
the
>sake of a better cost/performance ratio." The AF lenses were simply an
>"Olympus" lens, as are the IS series zooms. One can make of that what
they
>wish.
>
>Every lens line has their dogs. Moose Peterson points out a few
Nikkors of
>such ill repute in his Nikon System book. I just sold a 35-70mm
f/3.5~4.5
>Canon FD which would better be described as an "S Canon FD" (ala the S
Zuiko).
>I'm not willing to repeat my vote on a Zuiko dog, least I get flamed.
Plus
>YMMV (Your Mileage May Vary), as well as Beauty Is In The Eyes Of The
>Beholder.
>
>Gary Reese
>Las Vegas, NV
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|