Joel Wilcox wrote:
> Giles,
>
> Your point is well-taken. One of the reasons I asked the question was that
> discussion of OM-2(x) and -4(x) board failures seemed to give the impression
> that a good working example was in danger of imminent demise. From the
> responses, I believe we have a proper correction of this impression. I had
> just found a good working OM-2S and was starting to feel like it was a time
> bomb. Most of these responses have quelled my fears. I like the camera a
> lot and hope to have it for many years.
>
> Joel
>
--
Joel;
The 2S is a great camera. I bought mine used about 5 yrs ago. No trouble
at all with it. (Knock wood!)
george :>)
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|