In your message dated: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 16:18:55 PST you write:
>So here are the questions again:
>
>1. Which one of the new OM bodies (OM reissues with possibly a few new
>features, one under $500, one ca. $700, and an OM-5 under $1500) would you
>buy in the next 2-5 years? Just one or two or all three? (You have to ask
>your own pocketbook and your buying habit.)
Probably a re-issue of an OM-2S, and an OM-5.
>
>2.Would you like to have an autofocusing OM-x? (Be honest. You don't need
>to be realistic here.)
Yes and no. For myself, I would seldom use it (and I'd hate to see
Zuikos go the route of newer Nikon autofocus... some of those lenses
don't seem very sturdy to me -- crinkle coat brass or steel and lots of
plastic). However, I think it would probably sell more cameras.
>
>3. Would you be willing to have a somewhat larger OM body so that several
>new features may be accommodated?
Yes, as long as it isn't as huge as a Nikon F4/F5.
>
>4. What is the single most important feature of the OM body that you would
>like to see retained? Please narrow your preferences down to the single
>feature. I will not count those votes with two items here.
Small, lightweight size.
Cheers,
--Lee
##################################################################
# This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
# To receive the Olympus Digest send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
# with subscribe olympus-digest in the message body.
#
# To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
# listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe olympus in the message body.
#
# For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
##################################################################
|