Tomoko Yamamoto wrote:
>
> >For your stats, the current list stats are:
> >olympus: 202
> >digest: 81
> ...which gives you an idea how many lurkers are out there...
> >
Another lurker has come out of the woodwork!!
> To those in a silent majority on the list:
> So here are the questions again:
>
> 1. Which one of the new OM bodies (OM reissues with possibly a few new
> features, one under $500, one ca. $700, and an OM-5 under $1500) would you
> buy in the next 2-5 years? Just one or two or all three? (You have to ask
> your own pocketbook and your buying habit.)
>
1. A reissue of the OM2S or an OM5
> 2.Would you like to have an autofocusing OM-x? (Be honest. You don't need
> to be realistic here.)
>
2. I would be interested, but not if it changed the shape and size of
the OM body.
> 3. Would you be willing to have a somewhat larger OM body so that several
> new features may be accommodated?
>
3. I use a winder2. If a new body is no larger than an OM with a winder
attached there would be room for batteries and additional electronics.
This new body with a built in autowinder should also allow optional
battery configurations.
> 4. What is the single most important feature of the OM body that you would
> like to see retained? Please narrow your preferences down to the single
> feature. I will not count those votes with two items here.
>
4. The ability to use current lenses and the OM system accessories.
##################################################################
# This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
# To receive the Olympus Digest send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
# with subscribe olympus-digest in the message body.
#
# To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
# listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe olympus in the message body.
#
# For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
##################################################################
|