> 1. Which one of the new OM bodies (OM reissues with possibly a few new
> features, one under $500, one ca. $700, and an OM-5 under $1500) would you
> buy in the next 2-5 years? Just one or two or all three? (You have to ask
> your own pocketbook and your buying habit.)
$500. But only if I was convinced that Olympus was going to be in the 35mm
business for a while.
> 2.Would you like to have an autofocusing OM-x? (Be honest. You don't need
> to be realistic here.)
Focus assist, yes. Not autofocus.
> 3. Would you be willing to have a somewhat larger OM body so that several
> new features may be accommodated?
I would prefer not. (I would also prefer not to go bald; preferences
don't count for much, do they?)
> 4. What is the single most important feature of the OM body that you would
> like to see retained? Please narrow your preferences down to the single
> feature. I will not count those votes with two items here.
Compatibility with existing lenses.
Unless that counts as part of the definition of "OM", in which case
size.
Steve Schaffner
sschaff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
##################################################################
# This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
# To receive the Olympus Digest send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
# with subscribe olympus-digest in the message body.
#
# To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
# listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe olympus in the message body.
#
# For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
##################################################################
|