On 6 Jan 98 at 12:21, Per Nordenberg wrote:
> Tomoko, even if your assumption is right I would think most people
> associates the name with the year 2000. As a result the name will probably
> sound very much "obsolete" in a few years time (as well as everything else
Yeah, right. So next you're going to tell me Windows 95 is obsolete... Hmmm...
you may have a point there... ;-)
> that is called "2000"). Therefore I think the name is not the very best
> choosen (why not OM-50?), and it´s surely not the first Olympus SLR capable
> of a shutter speed of1/2000, The whole IS line is capable of that.
As are most of the OMs, too (I think). I seem to recall that the OM-2 and even
my lowly OM-10 have a "hidden" top speed of 1/2000 in auto mode to provide an
extra stop of overexposure insurance.
========================
Shawn Wright
Computer Systems Manager
Shawnigan Lake School
250-743-6240
swright@xxxxxxxxx
##################################################################
# This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
# To receive the Olympus Digest send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
# with subscribe olympus-digest in the message body.
#
# To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
# listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe olympus in the message body.
#
# For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
##################################################################
|