On 10/27/2024 6:33 AM, MICHAEL GORDON via olympus wrote:
GAS Moose writes:
There's enough of value to me to make the upgrade.*
Yes, good price. What features were attractive enough for the pain of
reconfiguration?
The link to Ken Rockwell's list is most comprehensive.
<https://www.kenrockwell.com/om/om-1-ii.htm#new>
Didn’t appreciate much change in IQ.
Same sensor and processor, so, no change.
The grad ND filter and higher stop dig ND filter features are nice but not that
compelling, IMO.
My thoughts, too, until I realized how many of the shots from this fall's trips would have benefited from a grad. I'm
not going to carry a set of filters. Built-in seems attractive.
Bigger buffer sounds good, too, for ProCap Modes.
Better stabilization for Dr. No Flash. Also for museum shots, etc. where flash
isn't allowed.
Here's a bit of fun from our visit to the Peabody-Essex.
<http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=Olympus_List/Posts/Misc&image=2024-10-16%2012-03-19%20%28B%2CRadius2%2CSmoothing4%29cr.jpg>
And I don't discount G.A.S. I guess I rather liked knowing I was using the most advanced computational photography
camera . . .
No time to migrate for modest gains, Mike
I hadn't considered the pain of reconfiguration until I had the camera in hand, which somewhat balanced it with the pain
of a return . . .
What Difference Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
| 