Thanks for the comparison, Moose, and your words are a perfect description of
what is attractive about the Culminar images.
Matter of fact, the bokeh could have originated from this place:
https://www.google.com/maps/@57.5955153,-4.3440639,3a,75y,13.8h,90.16t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1seJgLX-Fgez5trgFZ9M4CEw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu
😊
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus <olympus-bounces+piers.hemy=gmail.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On
Behalf Of Moose
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2023 12:31 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] More Steinheil Munchen Culminar 135m f4.5
On 5/8/2023 1:20 AM, Piers Hemy wrote:
> Some very appealing images there, Moose - but I am in some doubt as to how
> much the appeal is down to Mr Steinheil, as opposed to alces alces!
Wow, thanks!
Apportioning blame/credit:
I obviously saw and shot things.
The lens added its particular "look" of moderate softness and gentle contrast
and saturation.
I controlled my fingers, so as not to make them to look "better" in post. 😁
The lenses just "look" different. Not an ideal comparison, but I took one of
the same subjects, different angle, mag.,
etc. with OM-1 and 12-200.
<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/Lenses/Steinhill_Zuiko/Steinhill_Zuiko.htm>
Moody Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|