Thanks, guys!!
On 7/24/2022 3:27 PM, Wayne Harridge wrote:
Well done! Any FB/FS for this one?
In retrospect, I thought I might have tried. Wouldn't need more than the first few slices, if it moved/flew. OTOH, I
think this particular shot nailed focus and the pose made DoF sufficient. Other shots around it were good, but not quite
as good.
An unusual one in how long it stayed unmoving.
On 7/24/2022 3:45 PM, DZDub wrote:
Fantastic! Congrats.
On 7/24/2022 4:51 PM, MICHAEL GORDON via olympus wrote:
Beautiful. The pupil is not centered so the ID seems ok. Look alikes exist.
Never have seen one.
Clearly not limited to Oregon, but a small range on West coast. I've never knowingly seen one. It would be easy to think
just another Western Tiger; That's what I was thinking, until I really looked at the photos.
Somehow captured some texture and wonderful iridescence w/o even fill flash.
Direct sun at a good angle, and my processing didn't hurt. 😁
The chance of my use of fill flash approaches zero, as a limit. And yet, a not bad collection, photographically, if not
taxonomically, of pix of Flutterbys. <http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=17808>
A part of that is that I am pleased with a decent shot of whatever Flutterby
happens across me
Happy Dilettante Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|