[OM] Correction - Photoessay: OM Zuiko 500mm f/8 Reflex

[Moose]

Oops, Piers was kind enough to point out that I somehow messed up a link.

http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/Lenses/MirrorBokeh/MirrorBokeh.htm

Chagrined Moose

On 7/26/2021 2:28 PM, Moose wrote:
> On 7/26/2021 1:23 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
> > > Perhaps there is a reason for 1/2000
> > With a usable aperture of f8 or f11, there is no such thing as 1/2000
> > with film unless you're using ISO 1600.
> Not a problem with the right gear and subject. The f16 shot below was ISO 100 @ 
> 1/20 second.
>
> Another advantage over the mirror lens is the ability to use small apertures to increase DoF. And, in the case of the 
> 600, improved bokeh. <cid:part1.35A4DD96.B90D7FAA@gmail.com>
> > But there was one thing I really did like about that lens.
> Aaaaand . . . . . . . . . ?
>
> Curious Moose

--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/