That one made it to the inbox. I'll quit while I'm ahead.
On 3/5/21 11:42 AM, Jim Nichols wrote:
Piers and Moose,
I found this in my quarantined mail from yesterday. I tried to add
the OM address as a "friend". I will see where this response ends up.
On 3/5/21 9:42 AM, Piers Hemy wrote:
Well *I* got /both/ OM list and LUG versions of the original
message, /and/ the forwarded versions.
If you are an outlier, Moose, what does that make me? An out-and-out
lier? Or just a liar?
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus
<olympus-bounces+piers.hemy=gmail.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of
Moose
Sent: 04 March 2021 19:34
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] TEST MESSAGE
On 3/4/2021 10:45 AM, Jim Nichols wrote:
Mailing Lists apparently present them with problems. My usual habit
is to post images to the Leica and Olympus Lists
simultaneously. Today, my "Eric" post made it to the LUG but not to
the Oly list.
I may, of course, be an outlier. I'm used to that. 😉 But I received
both your original "Eric" post and the forwarded
version.
It may be that you were the only Oly listee who didn't get it. I
don't see my outgoing messages to the list, for
whatever reason. The server change may have simply changed that bit
of behavior.
Included Moose
--
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|