Re: [OM] TEST MESSAGE

[Jim Nichols]

Piers and Moose,

I found this in my quarantined mail from yesterday.  I tried to add the 
OM address as a "friend".  I will see where this response ends up.
On 3/5/21 9:42 AM, Piers Hemy wrote:
> Well *I* got /both/  OM list and LUG versions of the original message, /and/ 
> the forwarded versions.
>
> If you are an outlier, Moose, what does that make me? An out-and-out lier? Or 
> just a liar?
>
> Piers
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: olympus <olympus-bounces+piers.hemy=gmail.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On 
> Behalf Of Moose
> Sent: 04 March 2021 19:34
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [OM] TEST MESSAGE
>
> On 3/4/2021 10:45 AM, Jim Nichols wrote:
> > Mailing Lists apparently present them with problems.  My usual habit is to post 
> > images to the Leica and Olympus Lists
> > simultaneously. Today, my "Eric" post made it to the LUG but not to the Oly 
> > list.
> I may, of course, be an outlier. I'm used to that. 😉 But I received both your original 
> "Eric" post and the forwarded
> version.
>
> It may be that you were the only Oly listee who didn't get it. I don't see my 
> outgoing messages to the list, for
> whatever reason. The server change may have simply changed that bit of behavior.
>
> Included Moose
--
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA

--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/