At 11/24/2020 01:05 PM, Moose wrote:
>On 11/24/2020 10:37 AM, Wayne Shumaker wrote:
>>One more time using different method to stack.
>
>>https://photos.app.goo.gl/smJj16PsBn776guD8
>
>Hey! Now it's looking good!
>
>>I was curious how many more pixels Helicon Focus raw converter used compared
>>to what ACR does. And I traced it to the 16:9 aspect ratio setting in the
>>camera. So my mistake. Not sure how to get ACR to ignore it, but the fix is
>>to use the crop tool in ACR to get back to the 3:2 aspect ratio.
>
>OK, color me mystified. I have, NEVER, EVER, set a camera to anything but its
>native format. I can't imagine why anyone with access to the cropping
>facilities available in all conversion and editing apps would do that.
>
>OK, OK, I did once attend a meeting of a small MF film club. One member was
>absolutely committed to the idea that square is the only good format. As I
>looked at his work, I was amazed that such an otherwise very talented
>photographer would persist in a framing/format that often didn't suit his
>subjects.
>
>A tentative, v. gentle question elicited a roar. I may not have been the first
>person to try to broach the subject. ð???
It was set in only one camera, A7iii, which I had been using for video and
likely forgot to change the format back, or more likely was not thinking
straight. Something I do a lot.
But the raw data still has everything and the crop tool in ACR can get it back.
WayneS
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|