Nice one, indeed.
On 5/8/20 12:17 AM, Moose wrote:
On 5/7/2020 1:04 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
I looked up a review of the Oly 300/4 lens and it does get a lot of
praise. But, I think I would take your route using the 100-400 if I
were to go for a long lens improvement. There are some interesting
ones on the used market these days.
I should have looked around more. Here's one with 100-400 on an E-M5
II. It was taken on the edge of desert, far from lights and pollution.
There is more detail visible.
<http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=Lunacy&image=_B008015fp.jpg>
Desert Skies Moose
--
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
