> You mention Portra 160 makes me smile. In my professional career, as I
> transitioned to digital, I went through a period of several years where I
> shot and had scanned film, and I discovered that scanned Portra 160 was a
> wonderful thing. It had a greater dynamic range than chromes and was sharp
> and crisp. I would still use it today if I wern't retired.
My only issue with Portra 160 is that we still don't have a decent
profile for it in Vuescan. Otherwise, I'm pretty sure that it would be
my normal FF camera setup. In all honesty, it probably still should be
my normal FF camera setup. It's really that good.
AG Schnozz
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|