I find the canon one looks like Windows'zes screen saver back then - soft and
over saturated.
The Agfa does look mushy and grainy (can’t be noise from the scanner here, can
it?) but the colours look closer to what my eye/brain/memory combo can imagine
the scene to have been.
Amities
Philippe
> Le 20 avr. 2020 à 06:53, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>
> On 4/19/2020 9:40 PM, Pearce, Wilfred via olympus wrote:
>> Viewing just the Velvia ones could skew things a llot, but all the many
>> times I have shot in nearby Colorado, my favorite films were Provia and
>> Agfachrome. Provia was the most accurate, and the Agfa favored landscapes
>> with lots of trees.
>
> I shot some Agfa, last time in my transition from film to digital. I found it
> to be very grainy, with muddy greens.
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/FilmvsDigi/FvD01.htm>
>
> Something weird with the contrast, too, low in light areas, high in darker
> areas. That could be the scanning, though.
>
> I found the Canon D300 much better.
>
> Leaving Film Moose
>
> --
> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|