Subject: | Re: [OM] News Flash-no flash |
---|---|
From: | Jan Steinman <Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 28 Mar 2020 08:43:36 -0700 |
> From: ChrisB <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > I prefer the idea of a constant light source in otherwise low light > situations, but how do the strengths compare? I don’t think constant sources can get within three stops of a good flash, all else being equal. I know my Speedotrons are about 5-6 stops brighter than my 1kW hot lights. Jan -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] IMG: Monks, Tina Manley |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] News Flash-no flash, Mark Kronquist |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] News Flash-no flash, Chris Trask |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] News Flash-no flash, Mark Kronquist |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |