On 12/19/2019 4:21 PM, Mike Gordon via olympus wrote:
Marnie is home more now and has taken a liking to watching photography
tutorials. She asked why she always uses ISO200 for best IQ when the
tutorials use 100 or lower.
'Cause the tutorials are with different cameras.
I quickly explained that that is the base ISO and lowest in noise and best DR
and going lower may be useful in some situations but not for IQ. Though is
it???
That's what all the testers I've read on the subject say.
I have not had time for a through review though seems noise might be lower at
the extended low ISO's with nearly identical DR but slightly less head
room???? ---after a firmware upgrade.
Perhaps need to reconsider---any thoughts on that?
Use the base ISO. That's what those who know the most about the camera believe to be best. If anyone does a FW change
that adds a lower ISO, it's strictly to keep folks who don't know any better from comparing them to others and carping,
or not buying.
If you want lower noise, better DR and less flare/brightness bleed, shoot HR. The multiple exposures stomp noise. Ctein
has a thing for shooting Christmas lights, and was blown away by this.
<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/E-M5II_HR/TreeLights.htm>
He bought one, and was very happy with it. :-)
Enabler Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|