Subject: | Re: [OM] Of Alaska, Photography, and Work |
---|---|
From: | Philippe <photo.philippe.amard@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 29 Jul 2019 23:18:44 +0200 |
I don’t or no longer like canon either - but I now feel reluctant using gear that is not part of a coherent system, don’t ask me why … Amities Drooless Philippe > Le 29 juil. 2019 à 23:15, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > >> Wondering, have you tried the Canon equivalent issue that matches the period >> the camera was produced? > > Not much. I've avoided Canon glass so far and have tried to keep my > Canon investment to a very well used 6D. However, as mentioned, the RF > is quite drool-worthy. Expensive, though. > > AG Schnozz > -- > _________________________________________________________________ > Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus > Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ > Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Of Alaska, Photography, and Work, Ken Norton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Of Alaska, Photography, and Work, Ken Norton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Of Alaska, Photography, and Work, Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Of Alaska, Photography, and Work, Ken Norton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |