On 4/28/2019 12:53 PM, tOM Trottier wrote:
On 23 Apr 2019 at 21:57 re:"Re: [OM] Image Processing - AAARGH!..."
Wayne Harridge(Wayne Harridge <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>) wrote:
The old OM Zuikos didn't need any correction !
...Wayne
How about the radioactive 55/1.2 ?
Am I to believe that radioactivity and linear purity are somehow connected? :-)
Long-normal, double Gauss designs generally have little distortion. My far
older Canon FD 58/1.2 has very little.
OTOH, the WAs did indeed benefit from PTLens. If I recall correctly, one of my first roll-overs was of a small bridge
shot with the 21/3.5. Moderate, but obvious, distortion, nicely corrected by PTLens.
Peripheral View Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|