Yes, I have one of those and it is certainly a very capable camera. It is not
much bigger than a 35mm SLR. It is in fact a rangefinder camera, with a
non-interchangeable f4/60mm lens. It does have one annoying quirk: the
viewfinder is vertical, so if you want to shoot a horizontal image, you have to
hold the camera vertically. I find this a bit awkward.
Cheers,
Nathan
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
<http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
<http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator
<http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
YNWA
> On 21 Sep 2017, at 00:06, John Hudson <OM4T@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I met a gentleman this afternoon in downtown Lisbon who was using a "Fujifilm
> 645" camera.
>
> In size it was midway between a Fujifilm X-Pro 1 and a Mamiya 7 II 6x7 medium
> format rangefinder.
>
> His 645 was most certainly a 120 roll film camera because I saw him removing
> a roll of 120 film.
>
> The 645's lens looked to be the size of Leica 50 / 1.4 Summilux with a broad
> 1.5" long lens hood.
>
> Does anyone have one of these cameras and can comment on its performance ?
>
> jh
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|