>
>>
>>> My first E-500 came with those lenses.
>>
>> No, it did not.
>>
>> It may have come with lenses of the same focal length ranges, but Jez is
>> referring to newer, smaller, lighter - and optically better, lenses for
>> µ4/3 mount.
>>
>
>Thanks Moose - I'm sure that as several years have passed the lenses have
>got better (even if software correction is needed for some distortions) so
>I suspect that what were reasonable Nikon lenses in 2004 are probably
>surpassed by cheap-and-cheerful 2017 lenses.
>
That certainly explains a lot. I could not understand why people were
saying positive things about those two lenses, but I did not understand that
there were NEW! IMPROVED! versions. But now I have to ask why one would invest
in a lens that requires software distortion correction when older MF lenses do
the same without the software crutch?
Chris
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|