| Subject: | Re: [OM] 250/2 Eye candy |
|---|---|
| From: | Jan Steinman <Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:06:45 -0700 |
> From: "Wayne Harridge" <wayne.harridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Anyone know how this would perform on m-2/3 ? Not that I'm interested in > purchasing ! I had it’s big brother for a while. The 350/2.8 did not perform well on 4/3rds. Everything looked a tad fuzzy, when compared with film/scan of the same scene. Pixel-peeping revealed dreaded colour fringing. :::: Jan Steinman, EcoReality Co-op :::: -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] IMG: Temperature-Tolerant Pansies, Jim Nichols |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] OT - Hacking Microwaves, Ken Norton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 250/2 Eye candy, Ken Norton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 250/2 Eye candy, Sawyer, Edward |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |