I also shoot JPEG on the X-T2, but that's only because I haven't
decided between the CC subscription, and the stand alone version...
I'll have to wait until Jan 21 and see what happens.
Amities
Philippe
2017-01-16 19:39 UTC+01:00, SwissPace <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Yes it's MAC only - Yes, I have tried it as I am not so happy yet with
> the results I see in LR for the X-T2. Although I could see a slight
> difference it wasn't enough for me to consider switching workflow. It is
> a free trial so you can test it yourself.
>
> I am actually trying out shooting jpeg rather than RAW (well with the
> X-T2 you can write raw to one card and jpeg to the other) which is more
> of a difference than between Irident and LR
>
> IanW
>
> On 16.01.17 19:22, John Hudson wrote:
>> Iridient looks to be for MACs and not for Windoze machines ?
>>
>> Am I right ?
>>
>> jh
>>
>> On 1/16/2017 2:06 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
>>> Bob,
>>>
>>> I have not used it, but I read a detailed comparison of the Fuji X-T1
>>> and X-T2 yesterday, and the reviewer advised that the Iridient converter
>>> was the best he had found for the RAF files.
>>>
>>> Jim Nichols
>>> Tullahoma, TN USA
>>>
>>> On 1/16/2017 11:58 AM, Bob Benson wrote:
>>>> Has any used Iridient as a raw developer?
>>>>
>>>> Bob
>>>
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|