The Schnozz opines:
<<However, if I were to experience a catastrophic loss and needed to
<<start over from ground-zero, I doubt that I would have any legacy
<<system items, but would go entirely with single-vendor, new system (or
<<new/used but current). But finding lenses that produce certain "looks"
<<would not be possible in most cases. I would have to accept the new
<<aesthetic and pretend that the other doesn't exist.
Nah, not sure I believe that. I am sure a few Zuikos would turn up in your
bag. I know a few would in mine as well as big foot and his longer brother.
His tiny longer brother is a gem.
https://blog.mingthein.com/2015/03/06/review-of-a-rare-bird-the-voigtlander-1804-apo-lanthar/
Have it in OM mount and it goes to 1:4 natively. Does great on extension and
fits in your pocket. I am not sure as to the hood MT refers. The round hood
of the CV90 is the designated hood for the CV180. The CV125 has a rectangular
hood--perhaps there
is another that I have never seen even on Steven Gandy's site. Did I mention
the CV 180 apo lanthar is tiny? (FF standards) No aspheric elements and
excellent bokeh under many conditions.
I agree Jim's re-shot still life is excellent and the combo of that legacy
lens and body very harmonious.
I hope it never happens but I don't buy it, Mike
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|