On 9/11/2016 6:17 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
I hope you'll report back on this. I suspect it may be difficult to maintain the "glow" after conversion to a print
and subsequent loss of dynamic range.
They lured me in with a $2 sale for 11x14 prints. The focus stacked dahlia images practically leapt off the glossy paper
and attacked eyeballs and brain. I may try the color on glossy and the monochrome-ish one on matte.
But that's just a guess. And, if it is workable, it may be critically dependent on the paper. One attempt may not
answer the question. Maybe (just from the marketing name since I know nothing else) Kodak "luster" might even be the
right stuff. :-)
Yeah, sucked me in, too. The surface is 3D embossed with a small pattern. I don't like the look close-up. Framed, on a
wall, it may be great. But until I confirm that, I'm shying away from it.
Surface Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|