On 7/31/2016 10:50 AM, Don Holbrook wrote:
This one is an in-camera stack shot in RAW w/EM1. Comes out of camera as a
jpeg.
I forgot that part. Overall, I've come to the conclusion that in-camera isn't
as good/useful overall.
http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=20480
These have both come out quite well!
This one is a 12 shot (step 2) Raw bracket. Computer/CS6 would not stack 12
frames, so I used the first 5.
I remember some pain and suffering doing panoramas in the past. Whether CS5 or 6 I don't recall. Also, I have a
considerably more powerful, multi-core machine with more memory now. My impression is that CC is improved in handling
stacks, but it could be mostly horsepower.
No editing. Agree with Moose on the #1 setting...last 5 were rather blurry.
The trade-off between subject depth, desired background focus/bokeh, stack size, focus differential and aperture is
complex. I feel like I'm starting to get a handle on it, but I'm sure some subject will prove me wrong soon enough. ;-)
{Moose}
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|