Joel, that's the main reason I got the E-M1. I only have two m4/3 lenses. I
see no real difference between them and the 4/3 ones in normal use. I only got
the 60 macro because of focus stacking. Also, the old film lenses are easy to
focus with it. Only my opinion.
----- Original Message -----From: DZDub <jdubikins@xxxxxxxxx>To: Olympus Camera
Discussion <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Sent: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 13:55:28 -0000
(UTC)Subject: [OM] Q: OM-D E-M1 + MMF + D.Zuiko Performance
Have any of you good people who own OM-D E-M1s used any of the threeversions of
the MMF adapter to get some use out of your old E-systemDigital Zuikos (or the
Panny-Leica equivalents)?
I have heard that AF speed is slow with these combinations. I couldprobably
live with that. My bigger concern would be focus accuracy. Forexample, I don't
think the older DZ 50-200 ever really focused accuratelywith the E-1,
particularly at the long end. The performance of that lensimproved a lot with
the E-3. I would not wish to get a E-M1 and haveperformance go backwards.
Again, speed is less of a concern than accuracy.
Thanks,Joel W.--
_________________________________________________________________Options:
http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympusArchives:
http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/Themed Olympus Photo
Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|