Subject: | Re: [OM] IMG: Turncoats |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 3 Feb 2016 18:57:59 -0500 |
No, no one was vulnerable to charges of treason. From Grant to Lee in
the surrender terms at Appomatix... " each officer and man will be
allowed to return to his home, not to be disturbed by United States
authority so long as they observe their paroles and the laws in force
where they may reside."
Full text of the surrender terms and Lee's response here: <http://legacy.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1865RELee-surrender.asp> Chuck Norcutt On 2/3/2016 4:42 PM, Moose wrote: because "After the U.S. Civil War <http://t.sidekickopen35.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJN7t5XYgfmKYPW4WzBHl3Mx_9dW3LqWkM56dQ1Jf7P8b5b02?t=http%3A%2F%2Flegal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com%2FU.S.%2BCivil%2BWar&si=6038418186567680&pi=c45d9c0d-0da6-4617-f165-12ba59ddcdea> , for example, all Confederate soldiers were vulnerable to charges of treason, regardless of their role in the secession or insurrection of the Southern states." -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Pictures!, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Pictures!, Jim Nichols |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] IMG: Turncoats, Moose |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] IMG: Turncoats, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |