It tickles me to listen to people wax poetic about the wonderful warm,
authentic quality of vinyl. I recall that when I had a rather high-end
audio system after exiting the U.S. Army in 1971, I also had a variety of
anti-static accessories to tone down those pops, hisses and whatnot that
everyone seems to love so much. I'm too old to give a rat's rear these
days, as my ears couldn't tell the difference between analogue and digital,
but I don't miss the pops and hisses at all. I'm gonna bet, though, that
someone on this list will disagree. <g>
--Bob Whitmire
Certified Neanderthal
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 7:48 PM, John Hudson <OM4T@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In as much as vinyl disk music recordings, and particularly from those
> recorded analogue, have an apparent sound quality superior to that from
> DDD, ADD or AAD compact disks, is the visual output from scanned film
> negatives superior to that obtained directly from digital cameras OR is the
> appeal of film somewhat akin to the retro-attraction of things old and
> romantic?
>
> Just curious .
>
> jh
>
>
>
>
> On 1/24/2016 8:29 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>
>> Welcome back, Richard.
>>
>> BTW, I just got the new Zone-10 launched and have all your stuff just
>> waiting for upload.
>>
>> And I'm shooting more and more film in the OMs.
>>
>> AG
>>
>> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|