Yes, the newspaper looks sharper but everything else just looks "smeary" to
me. I prefer the grain. I'm giving up on these for the time being but may
return to them in another life.
Tina
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm guessing that other side of this conversation is on the LUG list? I
> was thinking myself of commenting on the high tone character of the
> Caballero that seems to me to lose important tonal detail.
>
> In addition to the grain, or whatever all those white speckles are, the
> scan seems to me too contrasty, with the midpoint too high, shadow detail
> lost. Whack the speckles and adjust the tones and I get this, which I find
> tonally much more appealing. <
> http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Manley/Shoeshine.htm>
>
> It may seem at first that detail has been lost, but look at the newspaper.
> As is often the case, spurious grain/noise may give the sense of
> sharpness/detail when it's not really there. The tonal adjustments could,
> of course be done while leaving more grain, if desired. But I did it to my
> taste. ;-)
>
> No Speckles On Moose
>
> --
> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
Tina Manley
http://
<http://t.sidekickopen35.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJN7t5XYgfmKYPW4WzBHl3Mx_9dW3LqWkM56dQ1Jf7P8b5b02?t=http%3A%2F%2Ftina-manley.artistwebsites.com%2F&si=6038418186567680&pi=249c6655-7a11-4521-bb16-6c49fae811fc>
www.tinamanley.com
http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|