I think each lens has its place. The 27mm is very compact, making the
camera less intrusive, but the 35mm opens up more low light
opportunities. I plan to continue to use both.
Thanks for looking and commenting.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
On 1/2/2016 1:05 AM, ChrisB wrote:
Good handholding skills, Jim :-)
I now wonder whether the 35/2 will supplant your 27mm . . .
Chris
On 1 Jan 16, at 22:06, Jim Nichols <jhnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In the first image, the University of Tennessee team is winning over
Northwestern in the Outback Bowl in Tampa, Florida.
http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/DSCF2794fm.tif.html
<http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/DSCF2794fm.tif.html>
In the second, my son, Rick, is keeping up with the world's activities on his
smart phone while enjoying the football game.
http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Rick.TIFF.html
<http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Rick.TIFF.html>
I am pleased with the results I am getting with this lens. The second shot was
at ISO 1600, and I used no noise removal in the processing.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|