Subject: | Re: [OM] Medicine Bow Peak |
---|---|
From: | John Hudson <OM4T@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 06 Dec 2015 22:09:07 -0400 |
Understood and thank you for the explanation. I have never done any side
by side stitching of images but from from yours and from those of other
OMers the side to side distortions [eg: cloud formations] look to be
invisible.
jh On 12/6/2015 9:05 PM, Ken Norton wrote: Something does not compute. Why bother with stitching 14 images side by side when a decent wide angle lens could [?] capture + / - 60 degrees per image when two side by side images would suffice.Well, a couple of reasons. I was using the 14-42 at 14mm, which has gobs of distortion to it. I would much prefer a 14-54 for this, but no 14-54 in the house right now. Or even the 11-22 would be sweet. To keep distortion correction to a minimum, I did a lot of overlap. Typically, what I do is make it possible to skip an entire image in the sequence if I have to, so I do about 1/2 overlap on each image. Second reason is that when shooting panos, you shoot with the camera vertically, so you maximize the number of pixels in the vertical dimension. Ken -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Medicine Bow Peak, Ken Norton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] No fly Friday, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Medicine Bow Peak, Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Panorama technique [was Medicine Bow Peak], Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |