That’s the way I think, Moose. If it has to go, it must be a sign that there
is a new lens needing to replace it – provided the funds are readily available,
of course :-)
Ken, the Fuji X Forum <http://www.fujix-forum.com/classifieds/
<http://www.fujix-forum.com/classifieds/>> is a good source of used bags at
good prices. I bought my Tenba DNA Messenger from a subscriber.
Chris
> On 16 Nov 15, at 21:27, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> 1. There is padding on the bottom of the insert.
> 2. As you say, the cameras aren't very heavy.
> 3. The 12-50 has it's hood on, which should sacrifice itself, if necessary.
>
>> In my camera bags, I usually have my lenses stored
>> vertically, but without a camera on top of them. The camera sits in
>> the bag not nose down. Either on the camera bottom or on the left
>> side.
>
> I have yet to find a bag that meets my criteria of size, weight and
> accessibility with the camera/lens combinations in any configuration but
> vertical. I want to be able to reach in, pull a camera/lens out and put it
> right up to my eye, ready to shoot - in a moment. That's one reason I think
> the on/off switch on the GX7 is genius. The new location on the E-M5 II is
> now usable, compared to the useless switch on the Mark I.
>
> 4. If having things the way they work for me means the 75-300 is sacrificed
> one day, unlikely as I think that is, it just gives me the opportunity to buy
> the later version. :-)
>
>> Thanks for the reminder that I should start keeping an eye out for a
>> new camera bag one of these years.
>
> Maybe you, too should visit my bag closet. :-)
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|