Subject: | Re: [OM] Digital Noise |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:51:35 -0400 |
I thought of glass plates shortly after I wrote that and after you
replied I wondered if glass plates are still in use for special
applications. It turns out they are still used in holography. From Wiki:
"The manufacture of photographic plates has been discontinued by Kodak, Agfa and other widely-known traditional makers. Eastern European sources have subsequently catered to the minimal remaining demand, practically all of it for use in holography, which requires a recording medium with a large surface area and a submicroscopic level of resolution that currently (2014) available electronic image sensors cannot provide. In the realm of traditional photography, a small number of historical process enthusiasts make their own wet or dry plates from raw materials and use them in vintage large-format cameras." Chuck Norcutt On 9/23/2015 9:25 AM, philippe.amard wrote: Le 23 sept. 15 à 14:54, Chuck Norcutt a écrit :Both are subject to Schott noise. What you considered a "twisted (slightly)" presentation had no effect on me at all. I think I understand his use of "image sensor" as something that retains the image on its surface as does film. That implies, of course, that there are other forms of chemical based "image sensor" other than film. I don't know of anyLight sensitive (glass) plates are another instance http://tinyurl.com/pj7j79j Phbut it doesn't bother me that I don't. Chuck Norcutt On 9/23/2015 1:16 AM, ChrisB wrote:Thanks, Chuck. Now he has lost me: I noticed a couple of other idiosyncrasies of language and ignored them, but to call film an “image sensor” as if there were some physical similarity between film and a chip and I lose interest.-- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exupéry in Le Petit Prince. NO ARCHIVE -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Digital Noise, philippe.amard |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Digital Noise, Ken Norton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Digital Noise, philippe.amard |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Digital Noise, Ken Norton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |