Re: [OM] IMG: Friends in B&W

[Chuck Norcutt]

Works the same for me.  I'm guessing the 35mm 1.4 was used on the first 
shot at about 6 feet.  DoF to make a reasonable 8x10 at that aperture 
and distance is only about 9".  Resolution for even a 4x5 would only 
cover less than 2 feet DoF.  Which is why Ken says print small.
Chuck Norcutt


On 8/27/2015 6:54 PM, Moose wrote:
> On 8/25/2015 1:23 AM, Peter Klein wrote:
> > Last week our friend, a symphony clarinetist, gave a garden party.
> > After sunset, it was too cold to eat outside, so we all ended up in
> > her studio for dinner.  Available dark time!  I set my Leica Monochrom
> > v.1 to ISO 2500 and 1/60, my 50/1.5 Nokton and 35/1.4 Summilux ASPH to
> > wide open, and did my thing.
> >
> > <https://www.flickr.com/photos/24844563@N04/20244128083/in/dateposted-public/>
> >
> > <https://www.flickr.com/photos/24844563@N04/20855514952/in/dateposted-public/>
> Good examples of shallow DoF images that do and don't work for me. In
> the first, I can't help but want the other people to be in focus. I
> understand this to be possibly idiosyncratic, but it's how I see.
>
> In the second, I like the isolation it gives from the background.
>
> Shallow Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/