This time I agree with Chuck, most images are a little dark. It is not about
the shadows, I like high dynamic images (not the usual flat looking HDR one
:-)), the shots themselves are very nice just need to push the exposure
higher, for example:
https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipOUOZDb4E6HRfwNOb8p88_rScPfF_QsxjCIoK8v2-Yp-wb_-0zXZ4ZjpeCeeqxFbg/photo/AF1QipOlpLCOWter1w8gt3Q72gfxkm1hqCAsbnQlOck7?key=RElzaGh2SXNGRGxDREJEcGZ3T3J6RTdtNWdXcUlB
http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/P6240052a.jpg
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
On 6/26/2015 8:37 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
I agree. I think most are too dark. Enough so that I didn't bother
stepping through the complete series.
I'm gonna mostly disagree. Many of the side lit ones with deep shadows
please my eyes.
Even with straight backlight, there is hope.
<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/IanNichols/P6240028.htm>
Alternative Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
| 