Hmm.. I read some tests claiming that the 14-42mm is a good lens, and not
worse compared to the 14-54mm/ 12-60mm (as long as you compare shared focal
lengths and speeds).
For instance this one <
http://www.photozone.de/olympus--four-thirds-lens-tests/451-oly_1442_3556?start=2
>
Never tested it myself though.
2015-06-25 0:06 GMT+02:00 Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > I can't comment on the 14-42. When I bought my E-510, I did some
> > research and bought the 14-54 (original). But, for what you are
> > attempting, the lens characteristics kinda go out the window, anyway.
>
> The 14-54 is certainly the better lens. I still kick myself for
> selling my old one when I got the Leica 15-50. But you are right in
> that once you start taking the excavators and bulldozers to an image,
> the lens' job is long since done.
>
> --
> Ken Norton
> ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.zone-10.com
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|