Re: [OM] OT: Recent debate on crop v FF

[Chuck Norcutt]

Thanks.  No, I hadn't seen that.  What I wish they'd show us is some 
absolutely smashing hi-res results that would show me if I wanted to 
wait around for the miracle or not.   :-)
Chuck Norcutt


On 1/21/2015 6:46 PM, Moose wrote:
> On 1/21/2015 3:08 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> > The only PhotoAcute support for Oly mirrorless bodies and lenses are
> > these:
> > ...
> Yes, I saw the list.
>
> > For me the only support is for my 12-50.
> I have an E-PL1, and a 14-42, but the E-PL1s came with the early, slow
> focusing 14-42, and mine is the latest one. Who knows what the profile
> is actually for, or whether the lenses are enough the same. And besides,
> that's the old 12 MP sensor, perfectly good, but hardly what I'd use for
> super rez testing.
>
> > But the trial software is free and doesn't expire because the output
> > is always watermarked.
> Did you look at the ORF pattern artifact sample at the link?
> <http://photoacute.com/forum/index.php/topic,205.0.html>
>
> I don't know if the example is worst case, but I do know it's ugly.
> Until they work that out or add a GX7 profile, I'm not seeing much point.
>
> Smooth Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/