Entirely appropriate, Nathan. But there’s something appealing about both shots
of photographer and model. I know what it is, the model!
And they are good shots, of course.
Chris
> On 17 Dec 14, at 06:13, Nathan Wajsman <photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Some may recall my pictures from the town of Onil posted about 3 weeks ago. I
> have recently received a roll of XP2 Super from the lab and scanned it
> earlier this week. I must say that as I remember it from the old days,
> chromogenic film is easy to scan, compared to the traditional kind—although
> of course you have to deal with the expense and wait to have it developed (in
> my case, I sent it to a lab in Valencia). The new pictures are added to the
> “Onil on film” gallery, starting with this one:
>
> http://www.greatpix.eu/Other/Onil-on-film/46169253_rr94pM#!i=3766566725&k=7mptkjh&lb=1&s=O
>
> <http://www.greatpix.eu/Other/Onil-on-film/46169253_rr94pM#!i=3766566725&k=7mptkjh&lb=1&s=O>
>
> Click on the little arrow above the image for the rest. These are mainly
> pictures of the participants—it seems somewhat appropriate to post film
> pictures of people taking part in a film photography workshop.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|