Fernando,
I suspect those were taken through a slit lamp microscope. This may be
of interest/ help: http://www.opsweb.org/
Charlie
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile <
fgonzalezgentile@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> Yes, I thought the same: those images are well above what I would have
> expected.
>
> I wonder how did the photographer do, to get that detail out of the
> iris muscle !
>
> And the anterior (flat) surface of the crystalline lens; and an
> invisible, unless by what it reflected, cornea.
>
> Fernando.
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 6:12 PM, SwissPace <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > HI Fernando,
> >
>
> > , however the images you linked to are fantastic and much
> > more detailed than the straight on views we took. I would think the
> biggest
> > problem is getting the subjects to stay still enough.
> >
> > <http://www.manfrotto.co.uk/midi-plus-36led-panel>
> >
> > Good luck
> >
> > IanW
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|