Subject: | Re: [OM] IBIS on the A7II and ? OMA9--works with OS in the lens too--implications for OMZ lenses |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 05 Dec 2014 08:32:33 -0500 |
Of course it would require some circuitry and contacts but that's what I
would have expected... or at least hoped for.
Chuck Norcutt On 12/5/2014 12:45 AM, Moose wrote: On 12/4/2014 5:22 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:I assume the 9/8.0 fisheye is a manual lens. But it's disappointing that it doesn't also tell its focal length to the camera.How could it do that? It is entirely mechanical, nothing electrical in it at all. Adding contacts and a chip to report what it is would probably add at least 50% to the price. The other thing is that ideally it should give its name, but not the EXIF focal length. Nine mm is purely nominal, or notional, or some such, as its mapping of space is quite different from a rectilinear 9 mm lens. And also, different from a conventional fisheye, either 180° as a circle, or the more common 180° corner to corner. It's "only" 140°, corner to corner, according to Oly. Curvilinear Moose -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: Liverpool pilgrimage, David Bell |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Rumored E-M5 Mk II, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] IBIS on the A7II and ? OMA9--works with OS in the lens too--implications for OMZ lenses, Moose |
Next by Thread: | [OM] IMGS: Shepherdess and Lama, Tina Manley |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |