Subject: | Re: [OM] 28-200mm Lenses |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 23 Nov 2014 03:01:04 -0800 |
On 11/23/2014 2:25 AM, Piers Hemy wrote: You need to fix your second link, Moose! EEK! Thanks, as it's the key thing. <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/Contrast_Resolution/Contrast_vs._Resolution.htm> Confabulated Moose I disagree, diametrically. Perhaps this will illustrate what I'm talkingabout. <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/Contrast_Resolution/Contrast_vs._Resolution.htm> -- What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about? -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 28-200mm Lenses, Piers Hemy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: how I spent Saturday morning, Jez Cunningham |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 28-200mm Lenses, Piers Hemy |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 28-200mm Lenses, Chris Trask |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |