Why do you need an Imatest? If you can't see it with your eye well...
you can't see it. Who wants to carry a shot filled bag for a
lightweight camera? If you consider it critical (I don't) then test
with and without a shot filled bag. If you can see a difference then
get rid of the camera *and* the shot filled bag and get a different camera.
Chuck Norcutt
On 10/12/2014 11:18 PM, Mike Gordon via olympus wrote:
One can be sure that an EFC will eliminate that and the anti-shock delay
will mitigate it but it is not clear to me that it is 100% eliminated.
Have not run across any Imatest type analysis to be certain. If I
wanted to be sure to have maximal resolution for large prints, would
use a shot filled bag or be sure to have an EFC option.
This type of analysis with various anti shock delay would be interesting:
http://blog.kasson.com/?p=5402
No shock, Mike
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|